<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KatTales &#187; Amazon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal/tag/amazon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal</link>
	<description>The Musings of Katrina Archer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 22:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon vs. Macmillan</title>
		<link>http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal/2010/01/31/amazon-vs-macmillan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal/2010/01/31/amazon-vs-macmillan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>katrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazonfail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday night, Amazon pulled all Macmillan-published authors&#8217; books from the Amazon.com site. You can still see the books listed, but you can&#8217;t buy them from Amazon.com, only from third-parties. The dispute was over e-book pricing, but as a bargaining &#8230; <a href="http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal/2010/01/31/amazon-vs-macmillan/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday night, Amazon pulled all Macmillan-published authors&#8217; books from the Amazon.com site. You can still see the books listed, but you can&#8217;t buy them from Amazon.com, only from third-parties. The dispute was over e-book pricing, but as a bargaining chip, Amazon decided to pull print books as well. This is like using a bazooka to swat a fly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not published. I&#8217;m not an industry insider. I&#8217;m a reader, and as a hope-to-eventually-be-published writer, an interested party.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t dispute Amazon&#8217;s right to not sell certain product. I don&#8217;t have a strong opinion either way about the value of Macmillan&#8217;s proposal, because I don&#8217;t know enough about the industry. I do know that a lot of authors I know and respect are now having their income streams slammed by a dispute in which they have no voice at the table.</p>
<p>I disagree with readers who say &#8220;Amazon is protecting the consumer by demanding a $9.99 price point&#8221;. As a reader, I did not understand the costs associated with a) writing a book b) publishing a book. But if one takes the Macmillan statement below at face value, Amazon is actually turning down potentially lower pricing. This is not consumer protection. From this consumer&#8217;s perspective it smells of oligopoly price-fixing. At what point does it veer into anti-trust?</p>
<p>This is not a case of authors being greedy. Most authors don&#8217;t even control the sale price of their books &#8211; once their contract is signed with a publisher, that control is out of their hands. If your sales numbers are in the four figures (not uncommon), you&#8217;re not making much as an author. Especially if the book took you more than a year to write.</p>
<p>In my opinion, this is a case of a near-monopoly distributor putting the smackdown on someone they are negotiating with, and in the process hurting a lot of authors who have absolutely nothing to do with the dispute.</p>
<p>In a free market, Amazon is perfectly within their rights. I also have the right not to purchase products from a company whose negotiating tactics I find distasteful. I will never buy a Kindle. I will be placing book orders elsewhere. In support of the many hard-working authors I know whose livelihoods have been impacted by Amazon&#8217;s heavy-handedness, I will be taking my business elsewhere.</p>
<p>Link roundup:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.publishersmarketplace.com/lunch/free/">Macmillan statement</a></p>
<p><a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-note-on-ebook-pricing/">John Scalzi</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfwa.org/2010/01/why-my-books-are-no-longer-available-on-amazon-com/">Tobias Buckell</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/01/amazon-macmillan-an-outsiders.html">Charles Stross</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jlake.com/2010/01/31/publishing-amazonfail-day-3/">Jay Lake</a></p>
<p><a href="http://sfwriter.com/2010/01/amazoncom-no-longer-carrying-tor-books.html">Robert J. Sawyer</a></p>
<p>A legal take by <a href="http://scrivenerserror.blogspot.com/2010/01/a131a.html">C.E. Petit</a> (via Charles Stross)</p>
<p><a href="http://antickmusings.blogspot.com/2010/01/amazon-and-macmillan.html">Andrew Wheeler</a> (also via Charles Stross), points out this isn&#8217;t the first time.</p>
<p>Updates:</p>
<p>[1:45 PM] <a href="http://www.edrants.com/macmillan-the-new-amazonfail/">Edward Champion</a> with more links to monopoly &amp; price discrimination resources</p>
<p>[4:35 PM] An <a href="http://www.sfwa.org/2010/01/amazons-response-to-macmillan/">update from Amazon</a>.</p>
<p>[8:30 PM] <a href="http://scottwesterfeld.com/blog/?p=2138">Scott Westerfeld</a></p>
<p>[10:15 PM] John Scalzi&#8217;s <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/02/01/all-the-many-ways-amazon-so-very-failed-the-weekend/">highly entertaining evisceration</a> of Amazon&#8217;s PR failures.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katrinaarcher.com/journal/2010/01/31/amazon-vs-macmillan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

